Most Read Blog Post

Social Dimensions of Education

Introduction to the Social Dimensions of Education
Sociologists see the education as one of the major institutions that constitutes society. While theories guide research and policy formulation of education, they also provide logical; explanations on why things happen the way they do. These theories help sociologists understand educational systems.
Consensus is a general or widespread agreement among all members of a particular society.
Consensus and Conflict theory
In order for us to understand why sociological theories could be classified into ‘consensus’ and ‘conflict’ perspectives let us examine the definition of consensus and conflict.                                                            Dahrendorf  (1959,1968) as cited by Ritzer(2000) is the major exponent of the position that society has two faces(conflict  and consensus) and that sociological theory therefore should be divided into two parts, conflict theory and consensus theory.
Conflict is a clash between ideas, principles and people.
Conflict  theory focuses on the struggle of social classes to maintain dominance and power in social systems.
Consensus theory emphasizes on social order, stability and social regulation
Consensus theories see shared norms and values as fundamental to societies, focus on social order based on tacit agreements and view social change as occurring in a slow and orderly fashion. In contrast, Conflict theories emphasize the dominance of some social groups by others.
Consensus theorists examine value integration in society in which the absence of conflict is seen as the equilibrium state of society based on a general or widespread agreement among all members of a particular society. Conflict is a disagreement or clash between opposing ideas, principles, or people – this can be a covert or overt conflict.
The Conflict theory, according to Horton and Hunt (1984) focuses on the heterogeneous nature of society and differential distribution of political and social power. A struggle between social classes and class conflicts between the powerful and less powerful groups occur.
Conflict theories ask how schools contribute to the unequal distribution of people into jobs in society so that more powerful members of society maintain the best positions and the less powerful groups (often women, racial and ethnic group) often minority groups, are allocated to lower ranks in society. The larger issue for conflict theorists is the role that education plays in maintaining the prestige, power and economic and social position of the dominant group in society.
The conflict perspective assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of conflicts or tensions between competing groups. Such conflict need not be violent; it can take the form of labor negotiations, party politics, competition between religious groups for members, or disputes over the budget.
Conflict theory grew out of the work of Karl Marx and focuses on the struggle of social classes to maintain dominance and power in social systems. It is a theory or collection of theories which placed emphasis on conflict in human society.
The discourse of conflict theory is on the emergence of conflict and what causes conflict within a particular human society. Or we can say that conflict theory deals with incompatible aspects of society. Conflict theory emerged out of the sociology of conflict, crisis and social change.
The conflict theorists are interested in how society’s institutions- the family, government, religion, education, and the media – may help to maintain the privileges of some  groups and keep others in a subservient position, Their emphasis on social change and redistribution of resources make conflict theorists more “radical” and “activists” than functionalists.
Consensus theory on the other hand, is a sociological perspective or collection of theories, in which social order and stability/social regulation form base of emphasis. In other words, consensus theory is concerned with the maintenance or the continuation of social order in society, in relation to accepted norms, values, rules and regulations as widely accepted or collectively by the society – or within a particular society itself. It merged out of the sociology of social order and social stability/social regulation.
The consensus and conflict sociological theories are reflected in the works of certain dominant social theorists such as Karl Marx, Emile Durkhoeim, and Max Weber and other prominent social theorists such as Talcott Parsons & Robert Merton, Loius Althusser & Ralph Dalhrendorf and Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer.
Status cultures refer to groups in society with similar interests and positions in status hierarchy.
Structural functionalism states that society is made up of various institutions that work together in cooperation.
Parson’ structural functionalism has four functional imperatives for all “actions” systems, embodied in his famous AGIL scheme. These functional imperatives that are necessary for all systems are:
1.       Adaptation: A system must cope with external situational exigencies. It must adapt to its environmental to its needs.
2.       Goal attainment:  A system must define and achieve its primary goals.
3.       Integration: A system must regulate the interrelationship of the component parts. It also manages the relationship among the other three functional imperatives (A, G, L).
4.       Latency (pattern maintenance): A system must furnish, maintain, and renew both the motivation of individuals and the cultural patterns that create and sustain the motivation.

Parson designed the AGIL scheme to be used at all theoretical system. The behavioral  organism is the action system that handles the adaption function  by adjusting to and transforming the external world. The personality system performs the goal- attainment function by defining system goals and mobilizing resources to attain them. The social system copes with the integration function by controlling its component parts. Finally, the cultural system performs the latency function by providing actors with the norms and values that motivate them for action.
Parson’s conception of social system begins at the micro level with interaction between ego and alter ego, defined as the most elementary form of the social system. He described a social system as something which consists of plurality of individual actors interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect, actors who are motivated in terms of a tendency to the “optimization of gratification” and whose relation to their situations, including each other, is defined and mediated in terms of a system of culturally structured and shared symbols.

The functionalist perspective is primary concern with why a society assures a particular form. This perspective assumes that any society takes its particular form because that form works well with the society given its particular situation. Societies exist under a wide range of environmental situations. Some societies have highly advanced technology and they also differ in terms of their interactions with other societies.
In any societies, however, the functionalist perspective makes one basic argument. Whatever are the characteristics of a society, those characteristics developed because they met the needs of that society in its particular situation. The key principles of ther functionalist perspective ( Farley,1990) include te following:

1.       Interdependency. One of the most important principles of the functionalist theory is that society is made up of interdependent parts.
2.       Functions of Social Structure and Culture. Closely related to interdependency is the idea that each part of the social system exist because of it serves some function. This principle is applied by both functionalist to both social structure and culture. The Social structure refers to the organization of society, including its institutions, its social positions, and its distribution of resources. Culture refers to a set of beliefs, language, rules, values, acknowledgement held in common by members of a society.
3.       Consensus and cooperation. Another principle key in functionalist theory is that a society has the tendency to towards consensus; that is to have the certain basic values to everyone in the society agrees upon. For example, we all believe in the principles of democracy and freedom. Societies tend toward consensus in order to achieve cooperation. Functionalist believe that inability will to cooperate will paralyze the society, and people will devote more and more effort to fighting one another rather than getting anything done.
4.       Equilibrium. A final principle of functionalist theorist is that of equilibrium. This holds that, once a society has achieved the form that is best adapted to its situation, it has reached the stage of balance eaquilibrium, and it will remain in that condition until it is forced to change by some new condition.
Equilibrium is the characteristic of a society when it has achjeived the form that is best adapted to its situation.

The component parts of a social structure
>families >neighbors > associations >schools
>churches >banks>countries

Symbolic interactionism views the self as socially constructed in relation to social forces and social structures.

Another important concept has long been used by symbolic interactionist is the looking-glass self. This concept was developed by the early symbolic interactionist theorist Charles Horton Cooley. The basic notion of the looking-glass self can be summed up as “we see ourselves as others see us.” In other words, we come to develop a self image on the basis of the messages we get from others, as we understand them.



  1. I love reading and as an educator it broadens my mind to tackle conventional topics as presented...Thank you so much...

  2. Thanks a lot. Yellowsplat will always be here to help you. People are always welcome to come and visit in here. Come Again!

  3. thanks for the information =)Yellowsplat

  4. You made some really good points there. I checked on the internet to find out more about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on
    this site.

    Have a look at my web page healthy waist to height ratio

  5. Nasa book to. The same wordings. I dont know kung alin yung original


We will be glad to hear from you =D

Follow by Email